Former Punjab Chief Minister and Pakistan Tahrik-e-Insaf (PTI) President Parvais Elahi said on Wednesday that an anti-judiciary campaign has been launched at the behest of PML-N Quaid Nawaz Sharif, ARY News reported.
Parviz Elahi said in a statement that the current government cannot impose “illegality” on the Supreme Court. He reacted to the judicial reform bill of the National Assembly.
After Maryam Nawaz and Rana Sanavara, Shabaz Sharif has also expressed his views against justice. At the request of Nawaz Sharif, the anti-judiciary campaign is being carried out.
Prime Minister Parvaiz Elahi criticized the Prime Minister and said that Shahbaz Sharif should go to a local health center for treatment. He added that a visit to a local health center may direct Shabaz Sharif’s attention to positive things.
He also criticized the mismanagement of the free wheat distribution center and said: The mismanagement of the government in the free wheat distribution center took the lives of many poor people.
He condemned the interim government of Punjab province and suggested that free flour delivery centers be established in rural health centers so that the injured can be treated immediately.
Yesterday, Parviz Elahi advised the federal government to conduct a mental examination of Interior Minister Rana Sanaullah.
Parvez Elahi said that Rana Sanaullah is still carrying the slogan “Maru Ya Mar Jao (Kill or Die)” to challenge Imran Khan. He added that the government should conduct a mental examination of Sanawara.
He said that Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) is defaming the honorable judge for its own benefit.
He criticized Prime Minister Shabaz Sharif for criticizing Sharif’s judiciary and the prime minister allegedly forced a judge to rule in his favor, so before launching into criticism, he reviewed his past and said it should be remembered.
Stating that there is no quarrel over those who support the judiciary or the constitution, the Tehreek-e-Insaf chief said that it is natural for any institution to have differences of opinion on technical issues. He added: All judges are equal
