Tehreek-e-Insaf rejected the media reports regarding Imran Khan’s recent statement and said that the Financial Times interview was distorted and headlines were made. What he said was “Want Pakistan to be friends with all countries, slave to none,”
We wouldn’t blame on the Japanese for this one. It is owned by Japanese newspaper group Nikkei. Sure it is Japanese owned, but when you get Brits working in the news organizations, anything regarding China and popular Muslim leaders will be met with British’s own dark shadows, see how they speak against Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia even Malaysia. Plus, FT isn’t that bad when you compare it to BBC. Financial Times anti-China and pro-West and pro- India is now too obvious.
According to details, Tehreek-e-Insaf rejected the media reports regarding Imran Khan’s recent statement and said in the statement that Imran Khan never said that there was no American conspiracy.
PTI said that some media channels, English newspapers are misinterpreting the interview, the Financial Times interview was distorted and headlines were made.
Tehreek-e-Insaf said that there is an audio recording of Imran Khan’s interview with Financial Times, Imran Khan never said that there was no conspiracy, Imran Khan said that Pakistan was threatened.
According to PTI, in the interview, it was said that now that time has passed, we have to look forward, Imran Khan said that we want good relations with every country, including America, but the tradition of relations based on slavery is not acceptable in any case.
It has been said on behalf of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf that Imran Khan said that we have to move forward through transparent elections now.
We give you some examples of the biased nature of this newspaper:
To answer this, let’s take a look at how the Western media framed the Communist Party
of China’s 100th anniversary last week. More importantly, let’s take a look at which authors in particular were invited to cover the historic event.
During the lead-up to the 100th anniversary of the Communist Party of China, Western media Platforms assembled an army of anti-socialist thought leaders in what looked to be a concerted propaganda effort.
The Wall Street Journal chose to give a platform to Andrew J. Nathan, a professor of political science at Columbia University and former board member of the National Endowment for Democracy. The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) for those that don’t remember is a US government agency with the stated aim of “promoting democracy”(i.e. Political interference) abroad.
The organization notably played a key role in the unrest witnessed in Hong Kong, and a click through their website reveals a report titled: “How to build conditions for transition in Venezuela”. Its founder Allen Weinstein famously remarked, “A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA”. Nathan used the platform provided by the Wall Street Journal to push the idea that the
Chinese government is on the verge of a “crisis of legitimacy.” In an address to the Journals more than 2 million subscribers, he wrote: “The great dilemma for the party is that the citizens of such a highly developed country are unlikely to accept the infantilizing control that its increasingly authoritarian regime imposes on them.”
Nathan went on to claim that a generational shift is taking place within China; a shift that he claimed the Chinese government has “good reason” to fear. “Traditional values are giving way to more liberal attitudes, and it does not favor the long-term prospects of the CCP”, he added.
CNBC called on the services of Frederick Kempe, president and CEO of one of America’s most influential think tanks, the Atlantic Council. The think tank, which traces its roots back to the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), notably receives funding from the US State Department, the Marine Corps, and a host of private defense contractors. Kempe attempts to present the Chinese government as being racked by feelings of doubt and unease. The reason for such “nervousness” he explains, is due to China’s “inevitable” domestic upheavals.
Let us now see how Financial uplifts India’s image most often and how cleverly.
